<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: it&#8217;s more than a question of self identity, really</title>
	<atom:link href="http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/</link>
	<description>huned botee</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: huned</title>
		<link>http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2253</link>
		<dc:creator>huned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2253</guid>
		<description>quoting esr: "attitude is no substitute for competence"

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html#believe5

matt from urban pug, aren't you an attorney? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quoting esr: &#8220;attitude is no substitute for competence&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html#believe5" rel="nofollow">http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html#believe5</a></p>
<p>matt from urban pug, aren&#8217;t you an attorney? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt from Urban Pug</title>
		<link>http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt from Urban Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>I'd bet Woz would say he's a hacker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d bet Woz would say he&#8217;s a hacker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huned</title>
		<link>http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2241</link>
		<dc:creator>huned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2241</guid>
		<description>pennypacker's always insightful, man.  thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pennypacker&#8217;s always insightful, man.  thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huned</title>
		<link>http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2240</link>
		<dc:creator>huned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2240</guid>
		<description>i created a page for myself on wikipedia once.  it was removed :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i created a page for myself on wikipedia once.  it was removed :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>I remember a meeting years ago at BEA when one developer said, "Call me an old hacker -- which I am -- but we should just try it out" etc. It occurred to me then that there was something not quite right with that statement. Like wikipedia: you don't create a page for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a meeting years ago at BEA when one developer said, &#8220;Call me an old hacker &#8212; which I am &#8212; but we should just try it out&#8221; etc. It occurred to me then that there was something not quite right with that statement. Like wikipedia: you don&#8217;t create a page for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pennypacker</title>
		<link>http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>Pennypacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 23:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-huned.com/2007/06/30/its-more-than-a-question-of-self-identity-really/#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>I know this is the bane of social-science, but I think the difference is intention and tone. 
You can claim to be part of a group to make yourself sound cooler, or to make fun of yourself. 

Example 1

A: Why is this code crazy and hard to follow?
B: Oh sorry, it’s me being a stupid hacker, I can’t help myself
A and B: Hahaha

Example 2

A: Why is this code crazy and hard to follow?
B: Because I’m a hacker and I’m cool like that, just learn to read it.
A: I hate your face. 

	In Example 1, B is probably a hacker. They are comfortable with the negative things associated with their group, and have a sense of humor about their own identity. In Example 2, person B is probably not a hacker. B is hoping A will be impressed by the positive associations of being a hacker without really explaining themselves. 

	It could also be said the difference is how group identification relates to self esteem. If one claims identity to give a false boost to their self esteem, they are probably not a member. If one claims it to show solidarity or make a joke about their own insecurities, then they are probably part of that group. 

-Pennypacker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is the bane of social-science, but I think the difference is intention and tone.<br />
You can claim to be part of a group to make yourself sound cooler, or to make fun of yourself. </p>
<p>Example 1</p>
<p>A: Why is this code crazy and hard to follow?<br />
B: Oh sorry, it’s me being a stupid hacker, I can’t help myself<br />
A and B: Hahaha</p>
<p>Example 2</p>
<p>A: Why is this code crazy and hard to follow?<br />
B: Because I’m a hacker and I’m cool like that, just learn to read it.<br />
A: I hate your face. </p>
<p>	In Example 1, B is probably a hacker. They are comfortable with the negative things associated with their group, and have a sense of humor about their own identity. In Example 2, person B is probably not a hacker. B is hoping A will be impressed by the positive associations of being a hacker without really explaining themselves. </p>
<p>	It could also be said the difference is how group identification relates to self esteem. If one claims identity to give a false boost to their self esteem, they are probably not a member. If one claims it to show solidarity or make a joke about their own insecurities, then they are probably part of that group. </p>
<p>-Pennypacker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
